Three Cores.
One Structure.
Built to Last.
We have built the technical and ethical foundations. Now we need the legal architect to complete the structure.
Join us.
Contact Us
Three Cores. Two Anchored. One to Build.
Most AI consultancies sell tools. Others sell fear. We set out to build something harder and more necessary: a company where technical innovation and ethical constraint aren't opposing forces, but interdependent pillars.
This page exists because we are looking for the human being who completes the triangle—not an employee, but a co-architect.
The Geometry of Responsible AI
Our name describes our structure. Remove one core, and the triangle collapses. Align all three, and you create a stable foundation for genuine digital transformation.
CORE I:
The Technical
Intelligent capture, ERP integration, and process automation that actually fits operational reality. We don't shoehorn clients into generic SaaS templates. We build adaptive systems, starting with deep workflow analysis, ending with bespoke solutions.
CORE II:
The Ethical
Privacy-by-design, algorithmic transparency, and governance frameworks that maintain human agency. We've proven that small-scale, artisan implementation can out-perform industrial-scale AI deployments precisely because ethical constraints drive better technical decisions.
CORE III (In Formation):
The Legal-Governance
This is where we evolve. The Australian regulatory landscape is shifting, WA Government AI Assurance Frameworks, emerging federal AI legislation, and increasingly complex Privacy Act obligations. Our ethical frameworks need legal architecture. Our risk assessments need regulatory rigour.
We need a third core that transforms our philosophical commitments into legally defensible governance structures, meaning converting ethical frameworks into binding protocols that withstand regulatory audit and litigation risk.
Philosophy guides our decisions; law protects our clients. As Australian AI regulation accelerates, from WA Assurance Frameworks to federal compliance mandates, we require a partner who can architect the concrete governance structures that make "doing the right thing" demonstrably defensible in court and in practice.
Contact Us
How We Got Here
We started with a practical problem: Perth organizations drowning in unstructured documents (medical records, legal contracts, government forms) while trapped between rigid legacy systems and risky offshore cloud solutions.
So we built OCR and ERP tools that respected data sovereignty. We embedded ourselves in healthcare clinics, manufacturing floors, and legal practices across Western Australia. We didn't just extract data; we learned the operational DNA of document-heavy industries.
But tools revealed patterns.
Every client asked the same unanswerable question: "We want AI efficiency, but how do we deploy it without exposing ourselves to regulatory risk, ethical lapses, or data misuse?"
We realized we weren't just in the business of document processing. We were in the business of technological trust. And trust requires more than clean code and good intentions. It requires governance.
So we committed to the second core: ethics-first AI advisory. Helping clients evaluate vendors, structure data governance, and navigate the ambiguity of emerging AI regulation.
Now we face the final evolution.
Without the third core (integrated legal and compliance expertise) we cannot offer the complete protection Australian businesses deserve. We can advise on ethics. We can build the technology. But we cannot provide the regulatory certainty that transforms risk management from anxiety into strategy. confidence scores

Where We Stand Today
We are operational. We are revenue-generating. We are not a "concept" looking for validation.
Validated:
Technical Implementation: Custom OCR and ERP solutions for healthcare, manufacturing, and professional services across Perth and WA.
Ethics Governance: Risk assessment frameworks, vendor evaluation protocols, and AI deployment strategies prioritising transparency and human oversight.
In Formation:
Legal-Regulatory Integration: The capabilities to formalise our ethical frameworks into binding governance structures, to navigate the Australian AI regulatory environment with legal precision, and to offer clients the complete triangle: Technical + Ethical + Compliant.We are deliberately staying artisan-scale. Close to clients. Personal. We are the antithesis of impersonal big consulting or transactional law practices.But we are honest about our perimeter.
To scale our impact without scaling our bureaucracy, we need a partner who speaks the language of both algorithm and statute. Someone who can build the third core while we continue strengthening the first two.
Build the Third Core With Us
You are likely:
- A lawyer (Australian qualified) with 5-10 years experience, or a brilliant junior with exceptional technical legal skills
- Exhausted by billable-hour metrics and hierarchical firm politics
- Genuinely fascinated by AI, data governance, and the regulatory frontier
- Based in Perth (or willing to be) and hungry to build something tangible
- Frustrated that "innovation" and "compliance" are treated as separate industries
What you'll actually do:
The terms are real:
The mechanics are detailed here: Detailed Partnership Terms & Application Process
But this page isn't about mechanics. It's about alignment.
Why This Matters Now
Australian businesses face an AI paradox. They need the efficiency gains, but they fear the regulatory exposure. The WA Government is finalising AI Assurance Frameworks. Federal AI regulation is inevitable. The market offers a false binary: tech vendors who ignore governance, or law firms who don't understand implementation.We're building the third way.
A Perth-based, artisan-scale firm where technical innovation, ethical constraint, and legal compliance are designed simultaneously; not bolted together after the fact.We have the technical capability. We have the ethical framework. We have the client relationships proving the model works.We need the legal architect.
If you're reading this and feeling the specific frustration of knowing you could build something better (but needing the right technical and ethical co-founders to do it) reach out.This isn't about filling a vacancy. It's about completing a structure.
Let's build.